GPT-5.6 Sol vs Pareto Code Router
Side-by-side API pricing and Artificial Analysis performance for GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI) and Pareto Code Router (OpenRouter). Green cells mark the better value in each row.
Prices updated Sep 16, 2026, 6:15 PM UTC · refreshed hourly
| GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI | Pareto Code Router OpenRouter | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | ||
| Input $/1M | $2.00 | $-1.0e+6 |
| Output $/1M | $10.00 | $-1.0e+6 |
| Blended $/1M (3:1) | $4.00 | $-1.0e+6 |
| RAG example (30K in / 2K out) | $0.08 | $-3.20e+4 |
| Quality & speed | ||
| Intelligence Index | 47.1 | — |
| Coding Index | 77.4 | — |
| Agentic Index | 50.5 | — |
| Output speed (tok/s) | 74 | — |
| Time to first token | 97.77s | — |
| Specs | ||
| Context window | 1.05M | 2M |
| Input modalities | file, image, text | text |
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Sol or Pareto Code Router?
Pareto Code Router has the lower blended API price at $-1.0e+6 per 1M tokens (3:1 input:output mix), versus $4.00 for the other model. Prices are live from OpenRouter and refresh about hourly.
Which is better for RAG workloads?
For a typical RAG request (30K input / 2K output tokens), Pareto Code Router costs about $-3.20e+4 per request versus $0.08. Also compare context windows: GPT-5.6 Sol offers 1.05M and Pareto Code Router offers 2M.
Which scores higher on Artificial Analysis benchmarks?
GPT-5.6 Sol leads on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (47.1 vs —). Check coding and agentic indices on this page for workload-specific tradeoffs.