Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)
Side-by-side API pricing and Artificial Analysis performance for Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic) and Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) (Google). Green cells mark the better value in each row.
Prices updated Sep 13, 2026, 10:38 AM UTC · refreshed hourly
| Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic | Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | ||
| Input $/1M | $2.00 | $0.75 |
| Output $/1M | $10.00 | $4.50 |
| Blended $/1M (3:1) | $4.00 | $1.69 |
| RAG example (30K in / 2K out) | $0.08 | $0.0315 |
| Quality & speed | ||
| Intelligence Index | 38.4 | 33 |
| Coding Index | 71.5 | 70.1 |
| Agentic Index | 44.3 | 27.3 |
| Output speed (tok/s) | 88 | 0 |
| Time to first token | 122.96s | 0s |
| Specs | ||
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text, image, video, file, audio |
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)?
Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) has the lower blended API price at $1.69 per 1M tokens (3:1 input:output mix), versus $4.00 for the other model. Prices are live from OpenRouter and refresh about hourly.
Which is better for RAG workloads?
For a typical RAG request (30K input / 2K output tokens), Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) costs about $0.0315 per request versus $0.08. Also compare context windows: Claude Sonnet 5 offers 1M and Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) offers 1.05M.
Which scores higher on Artificial Analysis benchmarks?
Claude Sonnet 5 leads on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (38.4 vs 33). Check coding and agentic indices on this page for workload-specific tradeoffs.