Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) vs GPT-5.6 Terra
Side-by-side API pricing and Artificial Analysis performance for Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) (Anthropic) and GPT-5.6 Terra (OpenAI). Green cells mark the better value in each row.
Prices updated Jul 22, 2026, 1:33 AM UTC · refreshed hourly
| Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) Anthropic | GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | ||
| Input $/1M | $30.00 | $2.50 |
| Output $/1M | $150.00 | $15.00 |
| Blended $/1M (3:1) | $60.00 | $5.63 |
| RAG example (30K in / 2K out) | $1.20 | $0.105 |
| Quality & speed | ||
| Intelligence Index | — | 55 |
| Coding Index | — | 76.7 |
| Agentic Index | — | 47.4 |
| Output speed (tok/s) | — | 157 |
| Time to first token | — | 104.73s |
| Specs | ||
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | file, image, text |
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) or GPT-5.6 Terra?
GPT-5.6 Terra has the lower blended API price at $5.63 per 1M tokens (3:1 input:output mix), versus $60.00 for the other model. Prices are live from OpenRouter and refresh about hourly.
Which is better for RAG workloads?
For a typical RAG request (30K input / 2K output tokens), GPT-5.6 Terra costs about $0.105 per request versus $1.20. Also compare context windows: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) offers 1M and GPT-5.6 Terra offers 1.05M.
Which scores higher on Artificial Analysis benchmarks?
GPT-5.6 Terra leads on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (55 vs —). Check coding and agentic indices on this page for workload-specific tradeoffs.