Claude Opus 4.6 vs Hunyuan A13B Instruct
Side-by-side API pricing and Artificial Analysis performance for Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and Hunyuan A13B Instruct (Tencent). Green cells mark the better value in each row.
Prices updated Jul 22, 2026, 1:37 AM UTC · refreshed hourly
| Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic | Hunyuan A13B Instruct Tencent | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | ||
| Input $/1M | $5.00 | $0.14 |
| Output $/1M | $25.00 | $0.57 |
| Blended $/1M (3:1) | $10.00 | $0.248 |
| RAG example (30K in / 2K out) | $0.2 | $0.00534 |
| Quality & speed | ||
| Intelligence Index | 37.8 | — |
| Coding Index | — | — |
| Agentic Index | — | — |
| Output speed (tok/s) | 57 | — |
| Time to first token | 1.85s | — |
| Specs | ||
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text |
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Hunyuan A13B Instruct?
Hunyuan A13B Instruct has the lower blended API price at $0.248 per 1M tokens (3:1 input:output mix), versus $10.00 for the other model. Prices are live from OpenRouter and refresh about hourly.
Which is better for RAG workloads?
For a typical RAG request (30K input / 2K output tokens), Hunyuan A13B Instruct costs about $0.00534 per request versus $0.2. Also compare context windows: Claude Opus 4.6 offers 1M and Hunyuan A13B Instruct offers 131K.
Which scores higher on Artificial Analysis benchmarks?
Claude Opus 4.6 leads on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (37.8 vs —). Check coding and agentic indices on this page for workload-specific tradeoffs.