Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5 Image
Side-by-side API pricing and Artificial Analysis performance for Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and GPT-5 Image (OpenAI). Green cells mark the better value in each row.
Prices updated Jul 22, 2026, 1:40 AM UTC · refreshed hourly
| Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic | GPT-5 Image OpenAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | ||
| Input $/1M | $5.00 | $10.00 |
| Output $/1M | $25.00 | $10.00 |
| Blended $/1M (3:1) | $10.00 | $10.00 |
| RAG example (30K in / 2K out) | $0.2 | $0.32 |
| Quality & speed | ||
| Intelligence Index | 37.8 | — |
| Coding Index | — | — |
| Agentic Index | — | — |
| Output speed (tok/s) | 57 | — |
| Time to first token | 1.85s | — |
| Specs | ||
| Context window | 1M | 400K |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | image, text, file |
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-5 Image?
Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5 Image currently have the same blended API price of $10.00 per 1M tokens.
Which is better for RAG workloads?
For a typical RAG request (30K input / 2K output tokens), Claude Opus 4.6 costs about $0.2 per request versus $0.32. Also compare context windows: Claude Opus 4.6 offers 1M and GPT-5 Image offers 400K.
Which scores higher on Artificial Analysis benchmarks?
Claude Opus 4.6 leads on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (37.8 vs —). Check coding and agentic indices on this page for workload-specific tradeoffs.