Claude Opus 4.6 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (free)
Side-by-side API pricing and Artificial Analysis performance for Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (free) (NVIDIA). Green cells mark the better value in each row.
Prices updated Jul 22, 2026, 3:55 AM UTC · refreshed hourly
| Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (free) NVIDIA | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | ||
| Input $/1M | $5.00 | Free |
| Output $/1M | $25.00 | Free |
| Blended $/1M (3:1) | $10.00 | Free |
| RAG example (30K in / 2K out) | $0.2 | $0 |
| Quality & speed | ||
| Intelligence Index | 37.8 | 14.2 |
| Coding Index | — | 14.4 |
| Agentic Index | — | 2 |
| Output speed (tok/s) | 57 | — |
| Time to first token | 1.85s | — |
| Specs | ||
| Context window | 1M | 256K |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text |
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (free)?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (free) has the lower blended API price at Free per 1M tokens (3:1 input:output mix), versus $10.00 for the other model. Prices are live from OpenRouter and refresh about hourly.
Which is better for RAG workloads?
For a typical RAG request (30K input / 2K output tokens), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (free) costs about $0 per request versus $0.2. Also compare context windows: Claude Opus 4.6 offers 1M and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (free) offers 256K.
Which scores higher on Artificial Analysis benchmarks?
Claude Opus 4.6 leads on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (37.8 vs 14.2). Check coding and agentic indices on this page for workload-specific tradeoffs.