Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Side-by-side API pricing and Artificial Analysis performance for Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (DeepSeek). Green cells mark the better value in each row.
Prices updated Jul 22, 2026, 3:52 AM UTC · refreshed hourly
| Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus DeepSeek | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | ||
| Input $/1M | $5.00 | $0.27 |
| Output $/1M | $25.00 | $1.00 |
| Blended $/1M (3:1) | $10.00 | $0.453 |
| RAG example (30K in / 2K out) | $0.2 | $0.0101 |
| Quality & speed | ||
| Intelligence Index | 37.8 | 21.4 |
| Coding Index | — | 43.5 |
| Agentic Index | — | 18.1 |
| Output speed (tok/s) | 57 | 0 |
| Time to first token | 1.85s | 0s |
| Specs | ||
| Context window | 1M | 164K |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text |
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus?
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has the lower blended API price at $0.453 per 1M tokens (3:1 input:output mix), versus $10.00 for the other model. Prices are live from OpenRouter and refresh about hourly.
Which is better for RAG workloads?
For a typical RAG request (30K input / 2K output tokens), DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs about $0.0101 per request versus $0.2. Also compare context windows: Claude Opus 4.6 offers 1M and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus offers 164K.
Which scores higher on Artificial Analysis benchmarks?
Claude Opus 4.6 leads on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (37.8 vs 21.4). Check coding and agentic indices on this page for workload-specific tradeoffs.